The six main themes/points/findings are of course a bit more clear when presented, so for those of you who missed N2 Social Media Hub on 10th November, please ask for more details.

It’ll be nice to see how many of these will be featured in 2012 predictions and trends.

The story begins with an art student doing her diploma and wondering whether an individual could buy ad space outdoors. She wanted to see something else in the city than the everyday ad clutter. In December 2010 she contacted JCDecaux, a leading outdoor advertising company in the world, and got an OK for her idea. Haluan nähdä muutakin  (“I want to see something else”) campaign was born.

So she made a Facebook page her project, and got 3500 fans in 10 days. She and her fans funded the project, in other words the ad spend for JCDecaux. The participants also collaborated on the poster that was to be placed on the JCDecaux frames. Each participant got to write her own ending to “I want to see…”, and all of the greetings were then made into one collage (see below, click to enlarge).

So this is the art part. Now, to the marketing. (Because, no matter how much you’d like marketing to be art at times, the former always serves a purpose – to be more precise, creating and delivering an offering of value to the customers – while the latter serves only itself. Glad we straightened that now, too).

A little after the before-mentioned “campaign” JCDecaux decided to jump on the bandwagon and do a spin-off. They called it simply Muutakin (“Something else”) and had 11 young designers do their own posters of which the public could vote their favorites on Facebook and decide what “else” they wanted to see in the cityscape this time (some of them below).

Although the original master-mind of the idea didn’t totally approve of the approach JCDecaux took, it was a nice approach from such a huge global player: to be able to take the chance and make a rather bold step to the arty direction, away from commercialism (which, to a great degree, is the core of their business).

And JCDecaux didn’t stop there with the Muutakin campaign. Next up was summer and its festivities in the city.

Muutakin teamed up with Helsinki’s no. 1 urban festival, Flow Festival. And this time they didn’t only engage the public in voting, but also in the creation of the posters. And they even topped the execution of the original collaborative artwork: this time the participants got to do their own artwork straight to the canvases at JCDecaux’s “bus stop” at the heart of Flow festival. Not only did they get “bus loads” of visitors, but also good publicity.

After the festival, they posted the posters on their Facebook page. After that, took them back to the streets. Then they further mixed offline and online with a contest where they encouraged people to share photos of Muutakin posters at bus stops to the Facebook page. The competition ended a month ago, so we’ll see what’s coming up.

The results aren’t counted in Facebook likes. They are more in the general “Like” points. The company that previously was just those frames now has a more humane side too: it’s part of the city life with its own story to tell. Sharing a link about an ad space company didn’t seem that likely before Muutakin.

And for the lessons for marketers:

• Embrace ad hoc opportunities. See the opportunity in surprising issued that come up. Be ready to adapt your approach / plans / visions.
• Offline and online are one. There isn’t likely to be online activity without something remarkable happening offline. And offline needs online to gain momentum and spread.
• Engagement needs commitment. Commitment to your customers / fans / stakeholders. Understand them and add value to them — only then can you earn engagement.

So congratulations for LinkedIn for its 100M members! And big thanks to Vincenzo, a colleague of mine from our Rome office, for this nice piece of infographic!

Did you know: piling up the business cards of 100M people would soar higher than three Mount Everests on top of each other. (Source: LinkedIn’s own infographic)

Now you do.

Anyone who doesn’t know what Hipstamatic is is probably living a life in which there are no iPhones or Facebook. The photography application has been named iPhone App Of The Year and downloaded more than 1.7M times during it’s first year (2010) according to The Wall Street Journal.

Hipstamatic was one of the first apps I downloaded, and I’ve been an avid user ever since. But I’m also a huge fan of it business-wise.

I love the way they have designed their business from a marketing point-of-view. The product itself is fantastic in what it is supposed to do: to bring back the look, feel, unpredictable beauty, and fun of plastic toy cameras of the past (quoted from their mission statement). But on top of delivering on this promise in a very user-friendly way, they have created a product with something I like to call built-in marketing auto-pilot. The (Hipstamatic photo)graph below explains this in more detail:

The existing customers will be happy capturing those special moments and bring more value and money for the company.

• Community. There is an active online community in which people share and discuss their Hipstamatic photos and attend competitions. This of course leads to…
• New lenses etc. For a mere 0,79 € the users can buy new sets of lenses, films, camera cases etc. A small price for a man, but a big pile of money for the company (which gets 70% of the revenue of each download).
• Ordering prints. Another easy-to-use service that the application offers is the print shop. With just few clicks the user can get his or her favorite photos delivered home for a reasonable price.

The customer-base will grow organically thanks to smart marketing-moves in business and product development.

• The story. The story of the company – or the myth – is carefully crafted. A conversation piece that spreads.
• The wow! effect. You know when you see a Hipstamatic photo. Maybe not the first time see one, but after that you do.
• The social media integration. It’s all built-in: Facebook, Tumblr, Flickr you name it. We’ve all seen in our FB news those albums called “My Hipstamatic Prints” with amazing shots that make us go “me too!”.

This is strategic marketing with capital S and M.

“The market is saturated, there is more supply than demand” concluded Ilkka Liukkonen the CEO of the Finnish Opticians Union (Suomen Optikkoliikkeiden liitto) on Kauppalehti. Another reason for the downfall of the industry are the expensive rents of the store locations.

When the going gets tough, what do the tough do?

Seek for a blue ocean.

Enter Warby Parker, a New York start-up and a manufacturer of fashionable vintage glasses. Against the conventional wisdom, they sell their glasses on their website only. You try the glasses on virtually (see below), or even order a set of five to try at home for five days, before buying them.

And why wouldn’t you buy them.They’re Brooklyn-fashionista-class fantastic and they only cost $95 a pair — 3 – 5 times less than competitors’ glasses. This is because Warby Parker cut out the middlemen and sell straight to customers, and thus avoided also extra costs of retail markups and brand licensing fees. Another thing they did against the common sense of the industry is that they only do the basic prescriptions, not bifocals for example.

Warby Parker is a brilliant example of a strategic marketing value innovation, where at the same time the costs go down and the customer value goes up. See the results for yourself: their business isn’t going down, but up, up, up — in the first three weeks they had reached their sales goal for the first year.

P.S. My personal fave is of course the monocle, which is, as their website puts it, “the perfect accessory for budding robber barons, post-colonial tyrants and super villains”. Just my style.

(Source: Business facts about Warby Parker from The New York Times.)

Metallica was one of the biggest bands of the pre-Internet world. While they have been busy trying safeguard their turf by waging a war against the pirates, Kanye and other digital native artists have been re-defining the business.

To the pre-Internet mind, a short film that is shared for free is pure madness. We create products and sell them for good money, say Lars Ulrich & co.

But the industry has moved from selling products to selling services. Products (songs) are provided, services (gigs) are sold.

It’s a dramatic change, and there is no stopping it. Broadband has made all content  hyper accessible – all barriers to reproduction and sharing have fallen down. Making money out of that content (i.e. songs and albums and the like), isn’t a sustainable business no more. Concerts offer a non-reproduceable, non-copyable, one-off experience and thus make for a stable earning model.

To put it in a very marketing way: songs are the ads for gigs.

This UGC ad encapsulates the idea of brand fandom.

The story goes something like this: Guys are at a bachelor party. They have loads of their favorite drinks, including the one on the video, the Finnish specialty: Original Long Drink. One of them shows off his skills in opening the bottle (yes, with a shovel). Others have their Nokia phones at hand and decide it needs to be filmed. They set up the cameras and have several takes (and bottles) till they feel they got it right. After the party, one of them does some editing, publishes it for the world to see, and spreads the word on social networks.

In the old world these guys would have been sued.

In today’s world they should be hired.

What I especially love about the production – in addition to it being real, genuine and original – is how the guys managed to grasp the essence of the brand’s personality into the setting: the whole idea of the Finnish summer. And also, a nice little detail in the end is the “product placement” of a small Finnish clothes company, Makia – another example of how fandom plays out.

“If you don’t communicate, someone else will do it for you.”

We all know what this means. Proactive communications is the key to success.

What it doesn’t mean, on the other hand, is that if do you communicate, someone else won’t still do it for you. And this is especially true in the age of social media.

A recent example.

BP (British Petroleum) had a major oil spill accident in the Gulf of Mexico on the 20th April 2010. Pictures say more than words. A true crisis — for both the company and the environment.

And BP did communicate. They sent out press releases, put up banners on their front page, did a specific landing page for the oil spill and tweeted like hell (see below).

So, with all this proactive communications effort, you’d figure they’d have the upper hand, right? Think again.

Despite the timely, open, multichannel communications by BP, there are still others doing the talking for them. See below the tweets by “BP Public Relations”.

BP official account has been up for about a year. It has nearly 5000 followers.

BP fake account has been up for about a week. It has over 25 000 nearly 40 000 followers.

The numbers speak for themselves. It seems that some amateur with an eye for communication beat BP hands down.

Does this mean it’s no use trying to communicate? Hell no.

It means you should realize that you don’t control the conversation whatever efforts you might pull. Let go – embrace the chaos.

Conclusion?

Some say conversation is the new king. I’d say content still rules the kingdom. And conversation serves it well.

So communicate. Make it relevant. Make it interesting.

Just don’t expect the to be the only one doing it.

There was a whole lot of inspiration in the air, as one might expect. Besides all those random, cross-discipline ideas that truly make TED what it really is, I especially picked up something communications and presentations related. This is what my notebook states:

• Virpi Kuitunen: How open and fragile, yet strong at the same time can one be. And how it touches the crowd and makes an impact.
• Anssi Vanjoki: How years of experience shows. In both good and bad.
• Mikael Jungner: Say something remarkable. Say it in a way that it sticks. One twitterer put it nicely: Jungner made a “social media smart speech”.
• Jufo Peltomaa: Standing out from the crowd by being yourself rocks.
• Miina Savolainen: Pictures really say more than 1000 words. No, actually they say more than any words ever could.
• Juuso Nissilä: Scientific studies to prove your point, common sense to sell it .  (Also, What I want for Christmas.)

Fortunately we’ll have a third one. And the one starting today on the railroad from Helsinki to Shanghai. And I assume these won’t be the last ones either.

The beginning of a new year – not to mention a new decade – is a great time to make predictions about the future. Or the near future, the upcoming year at least.

I’ve been enthusiastically going thru various digital communications and social media trends forecasts. (Good reads include this TIME magazine article and TrendSpotting research)

Picking from that lot and adding my own recent experiences, I nominate location-based services as the thing in digital communications in 2010.

Basically location-based services are “information and entertainment services, accessible with mobile devices through the mobile network and utilizing the ability to make use of the geographical position of the mobile device” (Wikipedia definition).

A short analysis of pros and cons of the prediction:

My top reasons why

1. Location data adds a new layer to communications. It is at the same time fresh, cool & exciting as it is practical & helpful.
2. Mobile web usage is ever increasing. Usage grew 148 % worldwide in 2009. Many markets have reached – or will in the near future – the critical mass for these kinds of services to fly.
3. It’s already here. Twitter added geolocation to tweets last year and location-based services like FourSquare and Gowalla could be this years Twitter hype-wise.

My top doubts why not

1. People are afraid of their privacy. There’s a limit to sharing your life online. Services need to make their privacy settings easily adjustable and respect the users’ wishes regarding their data.
2. Population density isn’t high enough. Sure these things work in let’s say Bay Area where there are a lot of people – tech savvy people, even. But take it to rural Finland and you won’t see that many people competing for being the mayor of the local gas station.

We’ll see how it’ll play out. In the mean time, I’ll be battling for those mayorships.

…

Edit (13.5.2010): Mashable just posted a good article that complements my “why not” list.